I imagine we all agree that the qualities required of a building are those of commodity, firmness and delight. This definition, given by Henry Wootten and taken from Vitruvius, appeals strongly to engineers. The structural engineer identifies his role with firmness; the services engineer, his with commodity or performance; and they both believe, with some justification, that the archi- tect's main concern is perhaps over-much with delight. The danger lies in thinking of them and valuing them separately. None is sufficient, all are requisite: none is independent, all are interdependent. The instrument re- quired for building design is not the inch ruler nor the straight edge, but the balance. I trained as a mechanical and electrical engineer without any clear idea of - which of many engineering careers I might follow. However, it seemed then, in 1947, that building services engineering was a rapidly expanding field and I was given the opportunity of joining a new practice set up in Dublin by a Danish engineer Jorgen Varming. He along with structural engineer Ove Arup rhad been invited by the Irish architect Michael Scott to assist him in a programme of buildings and in particular the now famous Dublin Bus Station.
This Le Corbusier-influenced building won for Scott the Irish Gold Medal and led later to the British medal. I worked for some months on plumbing details for the Bus Station and realised that my engineering education had taught me little about building engineering and nothing about architecture.
If you would like to view the whole talk please follow one of the following linksSubscribe
Or if you already have an account:
When you purchase a talk from Pidgeon Digital, you can watch it up to 10 times in a 72 hour period. You will receive an email with a link to your talk once it's been purchased. Please check your junk mail if you have not received it or contact us if you have any problems.
Do you want to purchase this talk for £5.00?